• latest twitter: constantskeptic: new post on CS Links for 2008-11-16 [del.icio.us]: Stairway To Heaven Chords (ver.. http://tinyurl.com/6dt57f
  • 31st December 2007

    Invest in Solar Now - Here is a huge reason why

    (disclaimer - this is still a work in progress, I did not get to edit this post as much as I wanted to, but it is new years eve so bear with me.)

     

    HEADLINE: ( courtesy of metaefficient.com )

    North America’s Largest Solar-Electric Plant Switched On

    North America’s largest solar photovoltaic system is now running and generating power — about 30 million kilowatt-hours of electricity annually. The 14 megawatt power plant is at the Nellis Air Force Base in the sunny desert of southern Nevada. It’s expected to save about $1 million in power costs annually, and reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 24,000 tons each year.

    This is a huge indicator that the US is moving towards accepting the fact that they need to be more diverse when it comes to energy resources. One day, the oil will be gone and by then all of the major players of the oil industry will have already bought up, invested in, and created a new ‘alternative energy industry’ complete with marketing strategies, fancy new gadgets, ‘green’ badging (as can already be witnessed by the latest ads from Exxon and BP solar.)

    Solar Panels

     

    GET INFORMED:

    Check out Exxon Mobil’s latest energy outlook 2007 PDF for 2030 including assessments for nuclear energy, fossil fuels, and alternative fuels. (PDF)

    Here is a description of it from the Exxon Mobil site:

    This year’s report focuses on energy demand to the year 2030, with particular emphasis on the increasing needs of the power generation and transportation sectors. It also examines how rising demand will be met from the various energy sources available, including fossil fuels, nuclear power and renewable energies. It also provides insight to the challenge of meeting growing energy needs while significantly mitigating global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.

     

    REBADGING GROUPS OF NATIONS: (OECD VS NON OECD)

    This chart can be pretty confusing unless you know what you are looking at.

    OECD countries are those that are top tier countries that participate and contribute to the global economy:

    The ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT

    Founding members (1961): (courtesy of wikipedia)

    Flag of Austria Austria*
    Flag of Belgium Belgium*
    Flag of Canada Canada*
    Flag of Denmark Denmark*
    Flag of France France*
    Flag of Germany Germany*
    Flag of Greece Greece*
    Flag of Iceland Iceland*
    Flag of Ireland Ireland*
    Flag of Italy Italy*
    Flag of Luxembourg Luxembourg*
    Flag of the Netherlands Netherlands*
    Flag of Norway Norway*
    Flag of Portugal Portugal*
    Flag of Spain Spain*
    Flag of Sweden Sweden*
    Flag of Switzerland Switzerland*
    Flag of Turkey Turkey
    Flag of the United Kingdom United Kingdom*
    Flag of the United States United States*

    Joined later (listed chronologically with year of admission):

    Flag of Japan Japan* (1964)
    Flag of Finland Finland* (1969)
    Flag of Australia Australia* (1971)
    Flag of New Zealand New Zealand* (1973)
    Flag of Mexico Mexico (1994)
    Flag of the Czech Republic Czech Republic* (1995)
    Flag of South Korea South Korea* (1996)
    Flag of Hungary Hungary (1996)
    Flag of Poland Poland (1996)
    Flag of Slovakia Slovakia (2000)

     

    So, basically, if you refer back to the chart, the NON OECD countries are the ‘developing’ nations that will have the highest growth in demand for renewable and non-renewable resources in the coming decades.

    What is interesting to me is that COAL not OIL will be the major source of demand for energy by the non OECD nations. This is another indicator if you connect the dots from exxon to bp solar to OECD to OPEC to the World Bank to wikipedia and finally to Kevin Bacon that alternative energy investment is a sure thing.

    Don’t believe me? Fine. Do your own research. Investigate which start up solar companies are being bought up by big oil corporations and invest in these companies, because the market has spoken.

    There will be no PEAK OIL DISASTER. Long before the oil runs out, the alternative energy market will be prosperous and fueling the world economy. Do not believe the hype from the gloom and doom forecasters that love to scare monger.

     

    From the Experts:

    Here is an academic who believes that society is not prepared for the coming oil crisis and is cashing in on fear mongering… who can blame him I guess

    (thanks Peak Oil News Blog)

    Colin Campbell, a British geologist who popularized the peak- oil theory in his book “The Coming Oil Crisis” (Multi-Science Publishing Co. and Petroconsultants SA, 1997, 210 pages) says world production of conventional oil, the kind that comes from gushing wells, is reaching its apex.

     

    Colin Campbell, a former petroleum geologist who is now a trustee of the U.K.-based Oil Depletion Analysis Centre, warned way back in 2002 that we were headed for peak oil production and that this would lead to “war, starvation, economic recession, possibly even the extinction of homo sapiens.”

    “Colin Campbell has the worst forecasting record on oil supply,” says Mike Lynch, who is president of the Global Petroleum Service (SEER), “and that’s saying a lot.” He points out that in a 1989 article for the journal Noroil, Mr. Campbell claimed the peak of world oil production had already passed and incorrectly predicted that oil soon would cost $30 to $50 a barrel. As for Mr. Simmons, Mr. Lynch dismisses him with a sneer: “Petroleum engineers know a lot more about petroleum engineering than a Harvard MBA.”

     

    Don’t you love it when academics and industry spokesmen clash? I am skeptical about both of their statements and I just have not done enough research of my own yet to decide whether or not the world’s transition out of this petroleum age will take a smooth or bumpy course. All I know for sure is that there are people out there with detailed plans on how to make money on this transition.

    Sphere: Related Content

    posted in alternative energy, environment, modern madness |

    6th December 2007

    Quote of the Day (QOTD) - Thoreau from Walden

    I always liked this one:

    I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, to discover that I had not lived.  I did not wish to live what was not life, living is so dear; nor did I wish to practice resignation, unless it was quite necessary.  I wanted to live deep and suck out all the marrow of life, to live so sturdily and Spartan-like as to put to rout all that was not life, to cut a broad swath and shave close, to drive life into a corner, and reduce it to its lowest terms, and, if it proved to be mean, why then to get the whole and genuine meanness of it, and publish its meanness to the world; or if it were sublime, to know it by experience, and to be able to give a true account of it in my next excursion.

     

    Walden or Life in the Woods

    - Henry David Thoreau (1817 – 1862)

    Sphere: Related Content

    posted in environment, quote of the day |

    10th November 2007

    Some Clarification on My Beliefs About Global Warming

    Usually nikon digital cameras are used by professionals. For security camera systems, the most popular choice is the olympus camera. Nowadays people are using the kodak camera too.

    As you probably have noticed when reading my previous posts on global warming, I usually post references and excerpts from other articles, but I let the readers form their own conclusions without any interference from me.

    Well, the time has come to let my opinion be known, and I hope to be frank and direct concerning my beliefs on the subject. I am also very interested in any opinions my readers have, since this has become a very politicized issue as of late.

    First Things First: What’s in a name?

    I may be going out on a limb right off the get go but, I believe that the term “global warming” is really a misnomer. What we are dealing with is global climate change. This change in terminology is not for any nefarious purpose, it is not spin-doctoring, it is just an attempt to clarify a complicated and often misunderstood concept. I have found through my research that how you refer to an issue affects to a certain degree how you think about the issue, so the correct name for a specific phenomena is very important.

    Global climate change is always occurring, it is perpetually in motion, and it would take place even if humans never existed on this planet.

    Yes, Antarctica will be ice free at some point in the future. I say buy some vacation property now…. the only thing that will keep people from moving there is a small tidbit of information that it just happens to be the windiest place on Earth.

    In general terms, the earth goes through long periods of cooling and warming, and this (according to the latest consensus) is a cyclical phenomenon. In fact, by all accounts, we should have entered the next ice age circa 1970 or so. The main problem that scientists are dealing with now is why we haven’t…. since we obviously are not in an ice age, we must be having some effect on our climate, but to what degree is the question.

    The ultimate questions to answer: (if anyone can answer these questions conclusively, then we have our global climate change issue solved)

    1. How much of an effect has the industrial revolution and the current petroleum dependant world system had on the climate?

    2. Can we measure a single person’s affect on the climate? (like measuring our ‘energy footprint’ but in terms of how much we are causing the Earth to get warmer)

    3. Can we prove beyond a doubt that we have gone beyond the ‘tipping point’ and that whatever we do to mitigate the effects of global warming it is too late to do anything about it? (some scientists believe that even if we stop all CO2 output right now, we are still doomed to suffer the consequences of our decadent energy consumption lifestyles)

    So, some interesting questions to ponder. Our fair leader, President Bush has stated time and time again that there is not enough evidence yet that global warming is taking place as a result of human activity. What do you think?

    If you read this far, you might as well comment and let me know what you think. I am actually hoping for a debate on this issue because maybe I have missed something in my research and I would love to add to my knowledge on this issue.

    Scaremongering at its best:

    Further Reading:

    scientific data on global climate change

    nature.org research

     

     

     

    Sphere: Related Content

    posted in environment, global warming |

    7th November 2007

    The Greatest Scam in Modern History - Global Warming?

    Brief history up to present global climaggedon:

    Back in the seventies it was global cooling…. the world was on a brink of the next ice age… and then,
    all of the sudden we produced a lot of smog that warmed up the Earth and we were saved! Yeah, go humans!

    But then Al Gore spawned out of the ether and presented us with AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH… and we are now again doomed by the threat of global warming.

    Are humans affecting global climate change? Who knows… but there is a lot of unnecessary scaremongering going on, but maybe that is the only way to make congress fund alternative energy research… what do you think?

    taken from icecap.us:

    “It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM. Environmental extremists, notable politicians among them, then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild “scientific” scenario of the civilization threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda. Now their ridiculous manipulated science has been accepted as fact and become a cornerstone issue Climate Change, is not about environmentalism or politics. It is not a religion. It is not something you “believe in.” It is science; the science of meteorology. This is my field of life-long expertise. And I am telling you Global Warming is a non-event, a manufactured crisis and a total scam. I say this knowing you probably won’t believe a me, a mere TV weatherman, challenging a Nobel Prize, Academy Award and Emmy Award winning former Vice President of United States. So be it.”

    Clipmarks - constantskeptic’s Pops

    Blogged with Flock

    Tags: , , , , , ,

    Sphere: Related Content

    posted in alternative energy, environment, global warming, gloom and catastrophes |

    28th October 2007

    How High Can You Jump Into the Water From Safely?


    Well, so how far can you jump from without suffering significant injury?

    The answer seems to fall around the 100 foot range. (28 meters)

    Here are some instructions and warning from the German Cliff Divers:

    “Imagine your body is accelerated to 90 km/h within 1.9 seconds. Immediately afterwards you are slowed down to 0 km/h within 0.8 seconds at a braking
    distance of 3.5 meters. When jumping from great heights the body is
    subjected to forces similar to those of a moderately severe accident, only a
    really well-trained body is able to cope with and resist these forces. Irregularities during the jump and the entering phase of a cliff jump can lead to severe or even very severe injuries for inexperienced and untrained
    jumpers under these unfavourable conditions.

    When consuming alcohol or drugs
    jumping can be fatal!”


    Tags: , , ,

    Sphere: Related Content

    posted in best of the web, environment, tips and random info |

    21st October 2007

    Video of Cuddle Fish and Anatomical Morphology

    amazing color changing ability…..

    Usually nikon digital cameras are used by professionals. For security camera systems, the most popular choice is the olympus camera. Nowadays people are using the kodak camera too.

    Sphere: Related Content

    posted in environment, video footage |

    2nd August 2007

    Some Skeptical Thoughts on the Honey Bee

    Well readers, it appears that the honey bee is not as important as we think to the continued existence of humanity as we know it…. and I do apologize for the earlier fear mongering, but bee extinction as the cause of an apocalypse was too good to resist. :)

    I still am worried about Einstein’s prediction that humans would disappear four years after bees did.

    taken from the orginal here: http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2007/aug/02/bee_or_not_bee/

    Before Europeans brought honeybees to the New World, all plants were successfully pollinated by native insects,” he says. “The honeybee (hive bee) Apis mellifera is not a native bee to the United States. There are many native Kansas insects, mostly different species of native bees that pollinate native Kansas plants.”

    So why all the commotion over the little non-native honeybee? Because they provide $14.6 billion dollars worth of free labor each year when they pollinate our gardens, orchards and crops. The U.S. Senate is even getting into the act, passing two bills this year: The Pollinator Protection Act of 2007 and The Pollinator Habitat Protection Act of 2007. The primary fear driving these bills is that one-third of the U.S. food supply might be in danger of substantial losses if honeybees don’t perform at their current rate.

    Sphere: Related Content

    posted in environment, gloom and catastrophes, modern madness |

    • Translate it into Your Language

    • Archives

    • If you like the Content and MP3s - Please Send Me Some Change


    • 007-ish gadgets

    • Enter your email address to subscribe:

      Delivered by FeedBurner




    • latest picture life

    • Dang, guess we will never know

      Full disclosure on UFOs

      Thunderstorm brewing in DC

      More Photos
    • great music now




    • The Thinking Blog
    • Click on date to see posts from that date

    • November 2008
      S M T W T F S
      « Oct    
       1
      2345678
      9101112131415
      16171819202122
      23242526272829
      30